Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vet J ; 269: 105603, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33593495

RESUMO

During diagnostic evaluation of hindlimb lameness in horses the tibial nerve block is traditionally performed based on anatomical reference points, but it can be difficult to achieve effective local anaesthesia using this blind technique. Ultrasound (US)-guided injection could increase the accuracy of injection. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of both techniques. Twenty-one paired sets of cadaver hindlimbs were injected with 1 mL methylene blue using the blind or US-guided technique. There was no significant difference in stain width and length and in coloured nerve length between techniques. However, the successful rate of nerve staining was 85.7% and 47.6% for the US-guided and blind technique, respectively (P = 0.02; odds ratio 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-29.4). This study suggests that the US-guided technique is more accurate than the blind technique. However, in the treated sample, a single US-guided injection did not consistently result in nerve staining.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/veterinária , Doenças dos Cavalos/diagnóstico , Coxeadura Animal/diagnóstico , Bloqueio Nervoso/veterinária , Nervo Tibial/efeitos dos fármacos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/veterinária , Anestesia Local/métodos , Animais , Cadáver , Membro Posterior , Cavalos , Injeções/veterinária , Azul de Metileno , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...